i curse you with unsolved mathdoku! oooooo you can’t resist it oooooo
(click on it to start, use wasd or hjkl to navigate and numbers to insert. refresh for a different puzzle)
i curse you with unsolved mathdoku! oooooo you can’t resist it oooooo
(click on it to start, use wasd or hjkl to navigate and numbers to insert. refresh for a different puzzle)
ive been wondering how much of my writing you all retain. maybe you have been wondering too. so i made a quiz. let me know what score you get!
i rarely feel more religious than when im watching Planet Earth (2006). the soaring soundtrack, the awe inspiring imagery, the fearsome powers of nature, and david attenborough possesses a voice that i like to imagine sounds sort of like God’s. it’s a cathedral in my TV.
theres something charming about artists who express disdain or even outright hatred for their own work. it usually speaks to a restless and relentless pursuit of perfection. its even funnier when the piece they finally do claim as their magnum opus isnt as well received as the ones they spat on.
but these guys are a dying breed. most of the art that reaches me is so thoroughly captured by commercial interests that the artists have to play a dual role as their own cheerleader, going on press tours to promote their own work at the behest of the publisher/studio/label. and even long after thats over, you dont want to harm the image of anything your publisher/studio/label has continued stake in, lest you harm your professional relationship and get blacklisted or whatever.
these days its pretty difficult to get actors to say “that movie i was in was trash”, or authors to say “that book wasn’t my finest moment”, or musicians to say “i hate my second album”. which is a real shame. i bet theyd love to speak their entire authentic opinions about their own body of work.
i keep noticing this pattern online among the commentariat where they act like a joke is really funny just because it requires some level of background knowledge to understand the punchline and thus flatters their self-conception of knowing obscure things. it should be noted the reference usually isn’t actually that obscure at all—which is why the joke-maker felt confident enough to deliver it in the first place—nor is it outrageously funny
i know this isnt a very novel observation but ive arrived at the same conclusion as everyone else: beekeeping seems like a cool way to spend my golden years. you get to be in touch with nature, it keeps you active, you’re caring for little animals with fascinating behaviors, you get some yummy honey and maybe some honey money, you get to overcome your fear of bees. its really just an all around great idea for anyone who can manage it.
remember when the video game and film industries realized it would be safer to cannibalize proven IPs and the ratio of sequels/remasters/reboots/remakes climbed precipitously in the 21st century? is it just me or are musicians rereleasing the same song across multiple editions of albums just so it has more opportunities to show up on your discovery feed. the algorithm needs to figure out how to punish this fr. i just got recommended a song in my discovery feed that ive already listened to like 50 times in the past week. it didn’t register as the same song because it was on a different edition of the same album (that only differed by a single song, i might add!). music historians are going to have a very hard time organizing the 2020s.